Fathom vs Notta

Overview

Fathom and Notta both solve the same fundamental problem: turning meeting recordings into actionable intelligence without manual transcription. However, they serve distinctly different organizational needs and workflows. Fathom positions itself as the meeting intelligence layer for sales and customer success teams, while Notta operates as a universal transcription and meeting documentation tool for any knowledge worker. The choice between them hinges on whether your organization needs specialized sales insights or broad-based meeting capture across departments.

Fathom is purpose-built for revenue teams. It automatically records video calls (Zoom, Google Meet, Teams), transcribes them, and surfaces sales-specific insights: competitor mentions, pricing discussions, next steps, and decision-maker sentiment. The platform integrates directly with CRM systems like Salesforce and Pipedrive, pushing meeting summaries and action items into your sales workflow without extra steps. For CMOs managing sales enablement or revenue marketing, Fathom reduces friction by embedding meeting intelligence into the tools reps already use daily. Its strength lies in consistency—every call gets the same structured analysis, creating a searchable repository of customer conversations that informs messaging and positioning.

Notta takes a broader approach, positioning itself as a universal meeting assistant for any professional context. It transcribes meetings, generates summaries, identifies action items, and allows collaborative note-taking in real-time. Notta works across Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, and even in-person meetings (via mobile recording). It's designed for organizations that need meeting documentation across sales, marketing, product, HR, and operations—anywhere people need to capture and share what was discussed. For CMOs in matrix organizations or those running cross-functional initiatives, Notta's flexibility and ease of sharing make it valuable for internal alignment and knowledge management.