Competitive Feature Matrix Builder
Market ResearchintermediateClaude 3.5 Sonnet or GPT-4o. Claude excels at structured analysis and producing clean markdown tables; GPT-4o handles nuance in competitive positioning. Both are strong; Sonnet is faster and cheaper for this task.
When to Use This Prompt
Use this when launching a new product, entering a new market segment, or refreshing positioning after competitive shifts. It cuts through subjective opinions and creates a fact-based foundation for messaging strategy and product roadmap prioritization.
The Prompt
You are a competitive intelligence analyst. Build a detailed feature comparison matrix that helps marketing leadership identify differentiation opportunities and messaging gaps.
## Input Information
Product/Service: [YOUR PRODUCT NAME]
Target Market: [INDUSTRY/SEGMENT]
Primary Competitors: [LIST 3-5 COMPETITOR NAMES]
Key Feature Categories: [LIST 5-7 FEATURE AREAS, e.g., "Pricing Model, Integration Capabilities, AI Features, Support, Security"]
## Your Task
Create a structured feature matrix that:
1. **Lists all competitors** (including our product) in columns
2. **Organizes features** by category in rows
3. **Rates capability level** for each feature using: "Advanced," "Standard," "Basic," "Not Offered"
4. **Identifies gaps** where we lead or lag
5. **Highlights messaging opportunities** - features we own that competitors lack
6. **Notes pricing alignment** - whether premium features justify price positioning
## Output Format
Provide the matrix as a markdown table. After the table, include:
- **Top 3 Differentiation Opportunities**: Features or combinations we own that competitors don't
- **Top 3 Vulnerability Areas**: Where competitors outpace us (for product/marketing response)
- **Messaging Recommendations**: 2-3 specific claims we can own based on this analysis
- **Feature Parity Risks**: Any "table stakes" features we're missing that hurt credibility
## Context
This matrix will inform product positioning, sales enablement, and content strategy. Focus on features that drive buying decisions, not minor functionality differences.
Get the Full AI Marketing Learning Path
Courses, workshops, frameworks, daily intelligence, and 6 proprietary tools — built for marketing leaders adopting AI.
Trusted by 10,000+ Directors and CMOs.
Tips for Best Results
- 1.Populate the matrix with publicly available information first (websites, pricing pages, demo videos), then add internal sales/customer feedback to validate. This hybrid approach is faster and more accurate than relying on memory alone.
- 2.Use consistent rating language (Advanced/Standard/Basic/Not Offered) to avoid subjective drift. Define each level once at the top: Advanced = core differentiator, Standard = expected, Basic = limited functionality, Not Offered = absent.
- 3.Focus on features that influence buying decisions, not technical minutiae. Skip 'has a dashboard' and instead compare 'real-time reporting depth' or 'custom metric creation.' This keeps the matrix actionable for sales and product.
- 4.Run this quarterly or after major competitor releases. Markets shift fast; a matrix from 6 months ago can mislead positioning. Set a calendar reminder to refresh when you hear about competitor feature launches.
Example Output
# Competitive Feature Matrix: AI-Powered Email Marketing Platforms
| Feature Category | Our Platform | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| **AI Copywriting** | Advanced | Standard | Basic | Not Offered |
| **Deliverability Optimization** | Advanced | Advanced | Standard | Advanced |
| **Segmentation Engine** | Advanced | Advanced | Advanced | Standard |
| **A/B Testing** | Standard | Advanced | Standard | Standard |
| **CRM Integration** | Advanced | Standard | Basic | Advanced |
| **Predictive Send Time** | Advanced | Not Offered | Not Offered | Basic |
| **Template Library** | Standard | Advanced | Advanced | Standard |
| **API Access** | Advanced | Advanced | Standard | Basic |
| **Compliance Automation** | Standard | Standard | Advanced | Standard |
| **Pricing Model** | Usage-based | Seat-based | Flat-rate | Tiered |
## Top 3 Differentiation Opportunities
1. **AI Copywriting + Predictive Send Time**: No competitor combines intelligent content generation with optimal timing—this is a unique workflow advantage
2. **Usage-based Pricing**: Competitors lock users into seat or flat-rate models; our flexibility appeals to scaling teams
3. **CRM-Native AI**: Deep Salesforce/HubSpot integration with AI features creates a moat for existing CRM users
## Top 3 Vulnerability Areas
1. **A/B Testing Depth**: Competitor A offers multivariate testing; we're limited to simple A/B
2. **Template Richness**: Competitors B and C have larger template libraries (may require design resources)
3. **Compliance Automation**: Competitor C leads here; we need to audit GDPR/CCPA automation parity
## Messaging Recommendations
- "AI that writes and times your emails—no manual optimization needed"
- "Pay only for what you send, not per user"
- "Native to your CRM, powered by AI"
## Feature Parity Risks
A/B testing is table stakes in this category. Competitor A's multivariate capability is becoming expected; we should prioritize this in Q2 roadmap.
Related Prompts
Related Reading
Get the Full AI Marketing Learning Path
Courses, workshops, frameworks, daily intelligence, and 6 proprietary tools — built for marketing leaders adopting AI.
Trusted by 10,000+ Directors and CMOs.