AI-Ready CMO

AI Marketing Risk Assessment Template

A comprehensive framework for identifying, evaluating, and mitigating risks associated with AI implementation in marketing operations. This template helps CMOs and marketing leaders systematically assess technical, compliance, brand, and operational risks before deploying AI tools. Use it to present a risk-aware AI strategy to executive leadership and board stakeholders.

How to Use This Template

  1. 1.**Step 1: Gather Stakeholder Input and Define Scope** — Before completing this template, convene a cross-functional team including marketing, IT/security, legal, compliance, and finance. Clearly define the AI initiative's scope, use case, timeline, and budget. Document the business objectives that justify the AI investment. This ensures all risk perspectives are considered and stakeholders are aligned on what's being assessed. Schedule a 90-minute kickoff meeting to walk through the template structure and assign ownership for each risk category.
  2. 2.**Step 2: Complete the Risk Assessment Matrix** — Work through each row of the risk matrix systematically, identifying risks specific to your AI tool and organization. For each risk, assess likelihood (Low/Medium/High based on your controls and environment) and impact (Low/Medium/High based on business consequences). Use the overall risk rating to prioritize which risks require detailed analysis in Section 3. Don't skip risks that seem unlikely—include them with a clear rationale for the low likelihood rating. This matrix becomes your executive summary and guides deeper investigation.
  3. 3.**Step 3: Conduct Detailed Analysis for High and Medium Risks** — For each risk rated MEDIUM or CRITICAL in the matrix, complete the corresponding subsection in Section 3 (Data Privacy, Compliance, Bias, etc.). Document current controls already in place, identify specific gaps, and propose concrete mitigation actions with owners and deadlines. Be specific: instead of "improve security," write "implement AES-256 encryption for data at rest by [DATE], owned by [PERSON]." This level of detail demonstrates rigor to leadership and creates accountability.
  4. 4.**Step 4: Build Your Monitoring & Control Framework** — Translate mitigation actions into ongoing controls in Section 4. Define who monitors what, how often, and what triggers escalation. Create a simple dashboard or scorecard that tracks key risk indicators (e.g., bias disparity %, incident count, compliance violations). This section proves you have a sustainable governance model, not just a one-time risk assessment. Assign a risk owner who reviews metrics monthly and escalates issues before they become crises.
  5. 5.**Step 5: Develop the Mitigation Plan Timeline** — In Section 5, create a realistic roadmap showing when each mitigation action will be completed. Sequence actions logically—for example, complete vendor security assessment before signing contracts, and finish bias testing before full deployment. Include dependencies and resource requirements. This timeline demonstrates that risks are being actively managed and shows leadership when they can expect full risk mitigation. Update this section monthly as actions complete.
  6. 6.**Step 6: Secure Executive Sign-Off** — Present the completed assessment to your approval committee (CMO, CISO, CLO, CFO, and project sponsor). Walk through the executive summary, risk matrix, and mitigation plan. Address questions about likelihood/impact ratings and mitigation feasibility. Obtain signatures in Section 7 to formalize accountability and ensure leadership understands and accepts residual risks. This sign-off protects the organization and demonstrates governance maturity to auditors and boards.

Template

# AI Marketing Risk Assessment **Prepared by:** [YOUR NAME] **Date:** [DATE] **Review Period:** [QUARTER/YEAR] **AI Initiative:** [PROJECT NAME] --- ## Executive Summary [2-3 sentence overview of the AI marketing initiative being assessed, including primary use case(s) and business objective(s)] **Risk Level:** [LOW / MODERATE / HIGH] **Recommended Action:** [PROCEED / PROCEED WITH MITIGATIONS / PAUSE / REJECT] --- ## 1. Initiative Overview ### Scope - **AI Tool/Platform:** [Name and vendor] - **Primary Use Case:** [e.g., predictive lead scoring, content personalization, campaign optimization] - **Departments Affected:** [List: Marketing, Sales, Customer Success, etc.] - **Launch Timeline:** [Start date to full deployment] - **Budget Allocation:** $[AMOUNT] - **Expected Users:** [NUMBER] team members ### Business Objectives 1. [Objective 1 with measurable outcome] 2. [Objective 2 with measurable outcome] 3. [Objective 3 with measurable outcome] --- ## 2. Risk Assessment Matrix | Risk Category | Risk Description | Likelihood | Impact | Overall Risk | Owner | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | [CATEGORY] | [Specific risk] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] | [CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW] | [NAME] | | Data Privacy | Unauthorized access to customer PII during model training | M | H | HIGH | [NAME] | | Model Bias | AI recommendations favor certain customer segments, reducing conversion for others | M | M | MEDIUM | [NAME] | | Brand Safety | AI-generated content misrepresents brand voice or values | L | H | MEDIUM | [NAME] | | Compliance | Output violates GDPR, CCPA, or industry-specific regulations | L | H | MEDIUM | [NAME] | | Integration | AI tool fails to integrate with existing martech stack | M | M | MEDIUM | [NAME] | | Vendor Risk | Vendor experiences outage, discontinues service, or changes pricing | L | M | LOW | [NAME] | | Skill Gap | Team lacks expertise to operate, maintain, or interpret AI outputs | H | M | HIGH | [NAME] | | Cost Overrun | Actual implementation costs exceed budget by >20% | M | M | MEDIUM | [NAME] | | Adoption | Marketing team resists using AI tool; adoption falls below 50% | M | M | MEDIUM | [NAME] | | Transparency | Inability to explain AI decisions to customers or regulators | M | H | HIGH | [NAME] | --- ## 3. Detailed Risk Analysis ### Data Privacy & Security **Risk:** [Describe specific data privacy concern, e.g., customer data exposure, inadequate encryption] **Current Controls:** - [Control 1] - [Control 2] - [Control 3] **Gaps Identified:** - [Gap 1] - [Gap 2] **Mitigation Strategy:** - [Action 1 with owner and deadline] - [Action 2 with owner and deadline] --- ### Regulatory & Compliance **Applicable Regulations:** - GDPR (EU customers): [Compliance status] - CCPA (CA residents): [Compliance status] - [Industry-specific regulation]: [Compliance status] **Risk:** [Describe compliance gap or regulatory exposure] **Mitigation Strategy:** - Legal review completed by: [DATE] - Consent mechanisms in place: [YES/NO] - Data retention policy updated: [YES/NO] - Third-party audit scheduled: [YES/NO] --- ### Model Bias & Fairness **Risk:** [Describe potential bias, e.g., demographic disparities in recommendations] **Testing Conducted:** - [ ] Bias audit across [demographic categories] - [ ] Performance parity analysis - [ ] Fairness threshold testing **Results Summary:** [Key findings from bias testing] **Mitigation Strategy:** - Bias monitoring dashboard: [DEPLOYED/PLANNED] - Quarterly fairness audits: [SCHEDULED] - Human review process for [specific decisions]: [IMPLEMENTED] --- ### Brand & Reputational Risk **Risk:** [Describe potential brand impact, e.g., AI-generated content misalignment, customer backlash] **Brand Safety Measures:** - Content guardrails defined: [YES/NO] - Brand voice guidelines provided to AI: [YES/NO] - Human review required for: [SPECIFY] - Monitoring system in place: [YES/NO] **Escalation Protocol:** - Issue detection method: [AUTOMATED/MANUAL] - Response time SLA: [HOURS] - Approval authority: [NAME/TITLE] --- ### Organizational & Skill Gaps **Risk:** [Describe capability gaps, e.g., team lacks AI literacy, no dedicated AI lead] **Current Capabilities:** - Team members with AI experience: [NUMBER] - Dedicated AI lead assigned: [YES/NO] - Training budget allocated: $[AMOUNT] **Mitigation Strategy:** - Training program: [VENDOR/INTERNAL] - Completion deadline: [DATE] - Ongoing support structure: [DESCRIBE] - Change management plan: [ATTACHED/PLANNED] --- ### Vendor & Technology Risk **Vendor Assessment:** - Company stability (funding, revenue): [ASSESSMENT] - Security certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001): [YES/NO] - SLA uptime guarantee: [PERCENTAGE]% - Data residency options: [LOCATIONS] - Pricing lock-in period: [DURATION] **Contingency Plan:** - Alternative vendors identified: [YES/NO] - Data portability verified: [YES/NO] - Exit timeline if needed: [DAYS] --- ## 4. Control & Monitoring Framework ### Preventive Controls | Control | Responsibility | Frequency | Status | |---|---|---|---| | [Control name] | [Owner] | [Weekly/Monthly/Quarterly] | [ACTIVE/PENDING] | | Data access audit | [Owner] | Monthly | ACTIVE | | Bias testing | [Owner] | Quarterly | PENDING | | Compliance review | [Owner] | Quarterly | ACTIVE | ### Detective Controls - **Monitoring Dashboard:** [TOOL NAME] — tracks [METRICS] - **Alert Thresholds:** [Describe triggers for escalation] - **Audit Trail:** [System logs retention: DURATION] - **Incident Reporting:** [Process and escalation path] ### Corrective Actions - **Issue Response Time:** [HOURS] - **Rollback Capability:** [YES/NO] — timeline: [HOURS] - **Escalation Authority:** [NAME/TITLE] --- ## 5. Risk Mitigation Plan | Risk | Mitigation Action | Owner | Start Date | Completion Date | Status | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | [Risk] | [Action] | [Name] | [DATE] | [DATE] | [NOT STARTED/IN PROGRESS/COMPLETE] | | Data Privacy | Implement data encryption at rest and in transit | [Name] | [DATE] | [DATE] | IN PROGRESS | | Model Bias | Conduct third-party fairness audit | [Name] | [DATE] | [DATE] | NOT STARTED | | Brand Safety | Establish content review workflow | [Name] | [DATE] | [DATE] | IN PROGRESS | --- ## 6. Success Metrics & KPIs ### Business Metrics - [Metric 1]: Target [VALUE], Current [VALUE] - [Metric 2]: Target [VALUE], Current [VALUE] - [Metric 3]: Target [VALUE], Current [VALUE] ### Risk Metrics - Incidents detected and resolved: [TARGET] per month - Bias disparity threshold: [PERCENTAGE]% maximum - Compliance violations: [TARGET] = zero - User adoption rate: [TARGET]% - System uptime: [TARGET]% ### Review Cadence - Weekly operational review: [DAY/TIME] - Monthly risk review: [DAY/TIME] - Quarterly executive review: [DATE] --- ## 7. Approval & Sign-Off | Role | Name | Signature | Date | |---|---|---|---| | Chief Marketing Officer | [NAME] | _____ | [DATE] | | Chief Information Security Officer | [NAME] | _____ | [DATE] | | Chief Legal Officer / Compliance | [NAME] | _____ | [DATE] | | Chief Financial Officer | [NAME] | _____ | [DATE] | | Project Sponsor | [NAME] | _____ | [DATE] | --- ## 8. Appendices ### Appendix A: Vendor Security Assessment [Attach vendor SOC 2 report, security questionnaire responses, or third-party assessment] ### Appendix B: Data Flow Diagram [Attach diagram showing how customer data flows through AI system] ### Appendix C: Compliance Checklist [Attach detailed GDPR/CCPA/industry compliance checklist with sign-off] ### Appendix D: Change Management Plan [Attach communication timeline, training materials, and adoption strategy] ### Appendix E: Incident Response Playbook [Attach procedures for responding to data breaches, model failures, or compliance violations]

Get the Full AI Marketing Learning Path

Courses, workshops, frameworks, daily intelligence, and 6 proprietary tools — built for marketing leaders adopting AI.

Trusted by 10,000+ Directors and CMOs.

Related Templates

Related Reading

Get the Full AI Marketing Learning Path

Courses, workshops, frameworks, daily intelligence, and 6 proprietary tools — built for marketing leaders adopting AI.

Trusted by 10,000+ Directors and CMOs.